<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Of all the marketing bullshit, what actually works?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mdaniels.com/of-all-the-marketing-bullshit-what-actually-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mdaniels.com/of-all-the-marketing-bullshit-what-actually-works/</link>
	<description>Branding and the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:36:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What fantasy sports addicts really know &#124; matt daniels</title>
		<link>http://www.mdaniels.com/of-all-the-marketing-bullshit-what-actually-works/comment-page-1/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>What fantasy sports addicts really know &#124; matt daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 01:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mdaniels.com/?p=553#comment-386</guid>
		<description>[...] reflects the advertising attitude of David Ogilvy, which I&#8217;ve idolized for its advocacy of research-based decisions. While instinct certainly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reflects the advertising attitude of David Ogilvy, which I&#8217;ve idolized for its advocacy of research-based decisions. While instinct certainly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew F Daniels</title>
		<link>http://www.mdaniels.com/of-all-the-marketing-bullshit-what-actually-works/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew F Daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 08:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mdaniels.com/?p=553#comment-375</guid>
		<description>I wrote this article almost a year ago--so it&#039;s good to reflect on where my head was. I do agree that it probably &quot;depends&quot; and there&#039;s no holy grail. But when I arrive at the &quot;Get Shit Done&quot; phase, I&#039;m looking for research-based answers or best-practices for making decisions, rather than relying on intuition or what feels right. That is, &quot;what works.&quot; At least that&#039;s what I was trying to communicate in the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote this article almost a year ago&#8211;so it&#39;s good to reflect on where my head was. I do agree that it probably &#8220;depends&#8221; and there&#39;s no holy grail. But when I arrive at the &#8220;Get Shit Done&#8221; phase, I&#39;m looking for research-based answers or best-practices for making decisions, rather than relying on intuition or what feels right. That is, &#8220;what works.&#8221; At least that&#39;s what I was trying to communicate in the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshklein</title>
		<link>http://www.mdaniels.com/of-all-the-marketing-bullshit-what-actually-works/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>joshklein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 01:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mdaniels.com/?p=553#comment-373</guid>
		<description>I think the answer to these questions you ask is always &quot;it depends&quot;, and that&#039;s why we marketers are so comfortable pontificating (or perhaps bloviating) endlessly for free; you can&#039;t just take these ideas and whip up some magic potion. Marketers make actual valuable contributions when a client says, &quot;we want to hire you to develop our digital strategy.&quot; At that point it stops being an exercise in hypotheticals and we Get Shit Done as it pertains to a specific industry, a specific client, and a specific competitive set. At least, that&#039;s how I roll!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the answer to these questions you ask is always &#8220;it depends&#8221;, and that&#39;s why we marketers are so comfortable pontificating (or perhaps bloviating) endlessly for free; you can&#39;t just take these ideas and whip up some magic potion. Marketers make actual valuable contributions when a client says, &#8220;we want to hire you to develop our digital strategy.&#8221; At that point it stops being an exercise in hypotheticals and we Get Shit Done as it pertains to a specific industry, a specific client, and a specific competitive set. At least, that&#39;s how I roll!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.mdaniels.com/of-all-the-marketing-bullshit-what-actually-works/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mdaniels.com/?p=553#comment-240</guid>
		<description>In terms of fundamentals, these all seem reasonable--but so do unique selling propositions, simple customer experiences, customer value, etc. What differentiates these fundamentals from the hundreds of others?

You&#039;re right about Jack Welch. To use him as a best practice is just as shortsighted as copying Apple--what worked for him might not necessarily work for you. But in this case, it&#039;s more of a management style, not an isolated product or industry. Like in basketball, there&#039;s something to be gained from studying the great coaches and players--their strategies and their decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In terms of fundamentals, these all seem reasonable&#8211;but so do unique selling propositions, simple customer experiences, customer value, etc. What differentiates these fundamentals from the hundreds of others?</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right about Jack Welch. To use him as a best practice is just as shortsighted as copying Apple&#8211;what worked for him might not necessarily work for you. But in this case, it&#8217;s more of a management style, not an isolated product or industry. Like in basketball, there&#8217;s something to be gained from studying the great coaches and players&#8211;their strategies and their decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Demori</title>
		<link>http://www.mdaniels.com/of-all-the-marketing-bullshit-what-actually-works/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Demori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mdaniels.com/?p=553#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Nice post Matt. 

If you&#039;re not already reading The Ad Contrarian blog, you should definitely check it out. He covers a lot of stuff you do in this post, like why people who claim Social Media is the answer to everything are way off: 

http://adcontrarian.blogspot.com/2009/08/more-social-media-baloney.html

&quot;If I am building a start-up, I want to know exactly what will convert customers and grow my business.&quot; -- so true. I eventually want to run my own business(es) one day, so I think about the same thing, especially when I&#039;m reading business books. 

So what&#039;s the answer? I think most of it is fundamentals: 

* Great customer service
* A product that fills a need
* Focus on your strengths instead of weaknesses
* Healthy company culture, etc. etc. 

But most people don&#039;t want to talk about the fundamentals because they&#039;re boring, or routine, or &quot;unsexy&quot;. The basics don&#039;t sell. On top of that, people are always looking for shortcuts (Ex: the weight loss industry over the past 30 yrs has exploded, but in the same time period, obesity has increased).

One other thing: you mentioned the &quot;all-stars.&quot; Personally, I avoid reading most autobiographies because they&#039;re so subjective by nature. Some of the best books I&#039;ve read like &quot;The Millionaire Next Door&quot; and &quot;First, Break All The Rules&quot; are based on extensive research and I think they give a nice objective overview of what happened and why certain things worked. 

If you take a book by Jack Welch, for example, I think what he thinks worked (and what actually did work) can be two different things. I&#039;m not saying that Welch wasn&#039;t successful - far from it, but what worked for him may not work for us. Not only that, GE was its own little world, and what worked for that company may not work in another. 

Which brings me back to why fundamentals are important. I think if we stick to them, we&#039;ll be OK. All the little things that make one successful company or leader who or what they are is specific to that situation. Jobs is known as a tyrant and a very difficult boss to work for - I don&#039;t think either one of us would agree that this approach is healthy or something we would want in our own companies, but it has worked for him (so far).

I think it&#039;s up to us, as future entrepreneurs, to master the fundamentals and figure out what those little things are - and make them work for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post Matt. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not already reading The Ad Contrarian blog, you should definitely check it out. He covers a lot of stuff you do in this post, like why people who claim Social Media is the answer to everything are way off: </p>
<p><a href="http://adcontrarian.blogspot.com/2009/08/more-social-media-baloney.html" rel="nofollow">http://adcontrarian.blogspot.com/2009/08/more-social-media-baloney.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;If I am building a start-up, I want to know exactly what will convert customers and grow my business.&#8221; &#8212; so true. I eventually want to run my own business(es) one day, so I think about the same thing, especially when I&#8217;m reading business books. </p>
<p>So what&#8217;s the answer? I think most of it is fundamentals: </p>
<p>* Great customer service<br />
* A product that fills a need<br />
* Focus on your strengths instead of weaknesses<br />
* Healthy company culture, etc. etc. </p>
<p>But most people don&#8217;t want to talk about the fundamentals because they&#8217;re boring, or routine, or &#8220;unsexy&#8221;. The basics don&#8217;t sell. On top of that, people are always looking for shortcuts (Ex: the weight loss industry over the past 30 yrs has exploded, but in the same time period, obesity has increased).</p>
<p>One other thing: you mentioned the &#8220;all-stars.&#8221; Personally, I avoid reading most autobiographies because they&#8217;re so subjective by nature. Some of the best books I&#8217;ve read like &#8220;The Millionaire Next Door&#8221; and &#8220;First, Break All The Rules&#8221; are based on extensive research and I think they give a nice objective overview of what happened and why certain things worked. </p>
<p>If you take a book by Jack Welch, for example, I think what he thinks worked (and what actually did work) can be two different things. I&#8217;m not saying that Welch wasn&#8217;t successful &#8211; far from it, but what worked for him may not work for us. Not only that, GE was its own little world, and what worked for that company may not work in another. </p>
<p>Which brings me back to why fundamentals are important. I think if we stick to them, we&#8217;ll be OK. All the little things that make one successful company or leader who or what they are is specific to that situation. Jobs is known as a tyrant and a very difficult boss to work for &#8211; I don&#8217;t think either one of us would agree that this approach is healthy or something we would want in our own companies, but it has worked for him (so far).</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s up to us, as future entrepreneurs, to master the fundamentals and figure out what those little things are &#8211; and make them work for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

