Hi there. I'm Matt. Don't hate the player. Hate the game.1

New here? More info about me here.

Subscribe via email or RSS

Nov 22, 2009 | Comments

Recently over a glorious dinner at Nyonya, a friend and I began discussing toothpaste (he is employed by Colgate).

It began with my claim that you’d have to be insane to pay for Colgate’s price premium ($1.50 – $2.00). Colgate’s mid-tier brand, Colgate Total, surely didn’t justify a 100% premium over the generics.

No-no, he claimed. Colgate is a much better toothpaste. It uses Tricoslan, a patented formula, unique to Colgate.

I retorted that Tricoslan, and any patented Colgate concoction, is merely a marketing gimmick.

Blasphemy, he replied. It’s scientifically proven. Colgate Total cleans teeth better. Others at the table agreed. Generics like Aim, though 99 cents a tube, are morbidly inferior. And everyone was sure that they don’t fall for marketing tricks. So I asked, “How do you know that Colgate cleans better? Because that’s what the commercials say?”

It’s odd that an entire dinner table can recall Colgate’s positioning statement (props to their ad agency). Why is it so memorable?

First, a short marketing history lesson. People are very good at inventing why it is that they act a certain way, especially when it is irrational.

Via The Blank Swan by Nassim Taleb: in an experiment, psychologists asked women to select from among twelve pairs of nylon stockings the ones they preferred. The researches then asked the women their reasons for their choices. Texture, feel, and color featured among the selected reasons. All the pairs of stockings were, in fact, identical. The women supplied backfit, post hoc explanations.

The same experiment is often repeated for Coke vs. Pepsi and functionally similar products. Our brains like to interpret our behavior, where benefits like “texture, feel, color” prevail. When we make choices because of an irrational benefit, like brand equity, it’s a tough story for our minds to digest.

The Proctor & Gamble folks, mid 20th century, incorporated this cognitive bias into their marketing. No one pays an additional $2 for toothpaste simply because it is superficially labeled “Colgate.” They need a reason to believe. Suppose you’re in the toothpaste aisle, reaching for the Colgate tubes. It costs more, but you recall that Colgate functionally performs (allegedly) better for XYZ reasons. The “reason to believe” is a nod to the rational mind, justifying the price premium and purchase.

A story like “Colgate has Tricoslan and a patented formula” is the “post hoc explanation.” It’s not invented in the research lab, but rather by a brand manager.

Now I didn’t manage to convince anyone at dinner. Fighting decades of advertising and brand equity is an uphill battle. But that’s why we see brands like Tide, Colgate, and Coke with 30%+ market share. It’s convincing and it works.

Blog Widget by LinkWithin
  • It's not that I'm cheap, but I really don't see any difference in buying an expensive tooth paste and the cheapest one in the store. The way I see it, both of them have the same effect. It's how often your brush your teeth that will matter, not the type of toothpaste that you use.

  • It's often just a matter of brand name these days. Brands that have been around for a while can get away with higher prices just because they're already established and have built a following.

  • Call me cheap, but I would always buy the cheapest brand. I don't think it would make much of a difference in keeping your teeth white. The way I see it, it's how you brush your teeth and what foods you eat that will determine how white your teeth will be. 

  • I would have to agree with Skye. Having clean and white teeth will definitely boost up your confidence. You can simply smile anytime you want wherever you are. 

  • Skye Marsden

    I've always wanted to have a pearly white teeth because it gives me the confidence I needed. And with that, I always visit my hendersonville tn dentist.

blog comments powered by Disqus